5.10 Adaptations and References

Sections of this chapter were adapted and remixed from:

• Crump, M. (2021). Mental Imagery. In Matthew J. C. Crump (Ed.), Instances of Cognition: Questions, Methods, Findings, Explanations, Applications, and Implications. https://crumplab.com/cognition/textbook 
• Murphy, G. (2024). Categories and concepts. In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba textbook series: Psychology. Champaign, IL: DEF publishers. Retrieved from http://noba.to/6vu4cpkt

References:

• Allen, S. W., & Brooks, L. R. (1991). Specializing the operation of an explicit rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 3–19.
• Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, object, and conceptual development. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
• Armstrong Jr, A. C. (1894). The imagery of American students. Psychological Review, 1(5), 496. https://doi.org/dkhdx2
• Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & cognition, 11, 211-227.
• Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Brown, R. (1958). How shall a thing be called? Psychological Review, 65, 14–21.
• Chen, J. M., & Ratliff, K. A. (2018). Psychological essentialism predicts intergroup bias. Social Cognition, 36(3), 301-323.
• Daniel Tammet. (2021). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Tammet&oldid=1027943120
• French, F. C. (1902). Mental imagery of students: A summary of the replies given to Titchener’s questionary by 118 juniors in Vassar college. Psychological Review, 9(1), 40. https://doi.org/cqj438
• Galton, F. (1865). Hereditary talent and character. Macmillan’s Magazine, 12(157-166), 318–327.
• Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. Macmillan.
• Galton, F. (1880). Statistics of Mental Imagery. Mind, 5, 301–318. https://doi.org/gg5vkv
• Galton, F. (1889). I. Co-relations and their measurement, chiefly from anthropometric data. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 45(273-279), 135–145. https://doi.org/dz5sd6
• Galton, F. (1890). Kinship and correlation. The North American Review, 150(401), 419–431.
• Garrod, S., & Sanford, A. (1977). Interpreting anaphoric relations: The integration of semantic information while reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(1), 77-90.
• Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Halpern, A. R. (1988). Mental scanning in auditory imagery for songs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 434.
• Hampton, J. A. (1979). Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 441–461.
• Horton, M. S., & Markman, E. M. (1980). Developmental differences in the acquisition of basic and superordinate categories. Child Development, 51, 708–719.
• Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., & Reiser, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(1), 47. https://doi.org/c8z6r3
• Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (2004). Dissociating explicit and procedural-based systems of perceptual category learning. Behavioural Processes, 66, 309–332.
• Mandler, J. M. (2004). The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Mareschal, D., Quinn, P. C., & Lea, S. E. G. (Eds.) (2010). The making of human concepts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/b6v5wv
• McCloskey, M. E., & Glucksberg, S. (1978). Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets? Memory & Cognition, 6, 462–472.
• Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179–195). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238.
• Mervis, C. B. (1987). Child-basic object categories and early lexical development. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 201–233). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Mervis, C. B., & Pani, J. R. (1980). Acquisition of basic object categories. Cognitive psychology, 12(4), 496-522.
• Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. Adams-Bannister-Cox.
• Murphy, G. L., & Allopenna, P. D. (1994). The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 904–919.
• Murphy, G. L., & Brownell, H. H. (1985). Category differentiation in object recognition: Typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 70–84.
• Onishi, K. H., Murphy, G. L., & Bock, K. (2008). Prototypicality in sentence production. Cognitive Psychology, 56(2), 103-141.
• Paivio, A. (1963). Learning of adjective-noun paired associates as a function of adjective-noun word order and noun abstractness. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 17(4), 370. https://doi.org/d2s523
• Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. (First English Edition) Hutchinson & Co.
• Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80(1), 1. https://doi.org/dbrvzx
• Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 12(1), 1-20.
• Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 111–144). New York, NY: Academic Press.
• Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
• Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.
• Rosch, E., Simpson, C., & Miller, R. S. (1976). Structural bases of typicality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 491–502.
• Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
• Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Smith, J. D., & Minda, J. P. (1998). Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1411–1436.
• Stigler, S. M. (1989). Francis Galton’s account of the invention of correlation. Statistical Science, 73–79. https://doi.org/dg8nxj
• Tanaka, J. W., & Taylor, M. E. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology, 15, 121–149.
• Titchener, E. B. (1905). Experimental psychology: A manual of laboratory practice (Vol. 2). Johnson Reprint Company.
• Tolman, E. C., Ritchie, B. F., & Kalish, D. (1946). Studies in spatial learning. I. Orientation and the short-cut. Journal of experimental psychology, 36(1), 13.
• Wisniewski, E. J., & Murphy, G. L. (1989). Superordinate and basic category names in discourse: A textual analysis. Discourse Processes, 12, 245–261.
• Zeman, A. Z., Della Sala, S., Torrens, L. A., Gountouna, V.-E., McGonigle, D. J., & Logie, R. H. (2010). Loss of imagery phenomenology with intact visuo-spatial task performance: A case of “blind imagination.” Neuropsychologia, 48(1), 145–155. https://doi.org/cmfgxv
• Zeman, A., Dewar, M., & Della Sala, S. (2015). Lives without imagery – Congenital aphantasia. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 73, 378–380. https://doi.org/gdf5hc
• Zeman, A., Milton, F., Della Sala, S., Dewar, M., Frayling, T., Gaddum, J., Hattersley, A., Heuerman-Williamson, B., Jones, K., & MacKisack, M. (2020). Phantasia–the psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes. Cortex, 130, 426–440. https://doi.org/ghdxvf
• Zimmer, C. (2021, June 8). Many People Have a Vivid “Mind’s Eye,” While Others Have None at All. The New York Times: Science. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/08/science/minds-eye-mental-pictures-psychology.html